🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide later this week on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are working on steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also crafting protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that when you cause all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."